Jerry does a bad, bad thing on "The Newsroom" |
Let’s get one thing out of the way to start. This week’s episode more than any before
showed exactly why it was a terrible idea to have the new guy Jerry be responsible
for the story that will bring down (?) “News Night.” And the biggest problem isn’t that Jerry is
the culprit, it’s that there was a perfectly good member of the main cast in a
situation to do the same. Maggie is
clearly messed up from Africa, she deceptively edited a recording last week
(whether intentionally or inadvertently was left up in the air), and they could
have easily given her a reason to be upset with the military (who abandoned her
at the school). She was also, as was
mentioned in the episode, involved in the Genoa investigation pretty much from
the beginning. There was absolutely no
reason to bring in an outside interloper to muck up this investigation (which I’m
still not entirely sure is bogus, despite Charlie’s pronouncement in the
closing deposition) when there was a perfectly valid reason for an existing
character to do it except that Sorkin loves his characters too much to let them
make mistakes. Todd VanDerWerff,
riffing off a statement made by Andy Greenwald, points out that Sorkin is a
writer who actually doesn’t like conflict among his characters, which is why he
so often brings in outside characters (Jerry, Reese, Leona) to introduce the
conflict he can’t let his main characters create.
I’m zeroing in on this one, seemingly small issue because it
is a non-minor flaw in what has otherwise been a pretty terrific storyline,
culminating this week with Jerry’s unforgivable act of manipulating the
recording of his interview with General Stomtonovich. As played, it’s not a bad piece of writing,
but it lacks the gravitas that would
come from a trusted character making the same decisions. I don’t know if we’re supposed to sympathize
with Jerry’s argument that the media is ignoring the Obama administration’s
treatment of human rights (drone strikes, etc.) in situations when they would
have excoriated the Bush administration, but it just rings hollow when he’s
faking recordings, even though his case seems strong. Put Maggie in the same situation and make it
a story about the soldiers who left her at that school and you have a much more
visceral story, one that gives its characters complex motivations rather than
just rendering them dupes of the interloper.
The frustrating part is that, one massive misstep aside, the
Genoa portions of “One Step too Many” made for a pretty fantastic hour of
television. Mac and Charlie track down
an absent-minded general who confirms that Genoa happened (including the “it
happened” line from two weeks ago).
Unfortunately, he won’t say so on the record, leading to Jerry’s
aforementioned editing. I’m really
skeptical that Sorkin’s going to find a plausible way to walk this story back,
given that we’ve still got a half dozen sources all saying the same thing. Unless this turns into another “very strong
tear gas” situation like the real Operation Tailwind, he’s going to have a lot
of explaining to do.
I could talk about the rest of the episode but, honestly, it
wasn’t that great. I’m more convinced
than ever that this show would work better as a 40-45 minute series with
commercial breaks. That way, we’d trim
all the fat (like anything involving Jim and Hallie and the extended
anti-Republican rant that had no thematic purpose in the episode) and keep the
tonal dissonance (like the transition from the Red Team meeting to Jim and
Hallie Skyping) to a minimum. The opening and closing scenes of this
episode were incredible and, limited to the Genoa investigation, it would have
been nearly perfect (Jerry issues aside).
But with so much extraneous bulge added in, it just wasn’t quite what it
could have been.
A few spare thoughts –
The decision to show Maggie cutting her hair in “Unintended
Consequences” but then have it normal in subsequent episodes was a mistake, not
because the timeline is confusing, but because we’re far enough removed from
her Ugandan excursion (more than five months now) that I’m beginning to think
the haircut is unrelated to Africa and something even worse is going to happen to
her in the future. I don’t mind some
shows giving me a constant sense of dread, but this is not one of them.
So who lit the bajillion candles in Jim’s room while he and
Hallie were at dinner?
“Why does a politician take polls?” “To find out what people want him to say the
next day. Are you comfortable with that
analogy?”
“It couldn’t matter less but Santa has nine reindeer.” “Rudolph!”
So thoughts?
Comments? Just want to tell me my
blog sucks? Let me know in the comments
or on Twitter @TyTalksTV.
No comments:
Post a Comment