Friday, April 11, 2014

Did Captain America: The Winter Soldier Solve Marvel's SHIELD Problem?



Is "Agents of SHIELD" on the verge of a breakthrough?

Ever since The Avengers hit theatres two years ago, I have believed that the Marvel Cinematic Universe has a SHIELD problem.  Namely, while Marvel would like to put out several standalone films (and a television series as it turns out) in between each Avengers movie, it can’t meld universes too much because doing so would require having multiple characters cross-over from film to film, thus accelerating the intentionally extended contracts of Marvel’s principle cast.  The question then is, how do you bring together all of these disparate characters once every three years and then expect them to support their own movies in between without acknowledging the presence of other superheroes?  While Iron Man 3 and Thor: The Dark World successfully managed to skirt the issue, Marvel’s Agents of SHIELD has been significantly less successful.  But this past weekend’s release of Captain America: The Winter Soldier may have fixed all of those problems while also fundamentally changing Agents of SHIELD.
Massive, massive SPOILERS for basically the entire Marvel Cinematic Universe and Agents of SHIELD coming up.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Seriously, if you haven’t seen the second Captain America movie, just turn away now.
.
.
.
.
.
.
So Captain America: The Winter Soldier saw the complete and utter destruction of SHIELD, the result of its infiltration by Hydra over the past sixty years.  The week before and after the film’s release, Coulson and the other Agents of SHIELD discovered that The Clairvoyant, the big bad whom they had been chasing for the last half season was not some supernatural power, but instead John Garrett, a fellow agent who has presumably been corrupted by the same Hydra forces.*  It brought to a thrilling conclusion (at least temporarily) the saga of SHIELD, which had a been a central force in the Marvel Universe ever since Samuel L Jackson’s surprise appearance as Nick Fury at the end of Iron Man.

* It's possible that Garrett is not The Clairvoyant, but simply his SHIELD emissary.  Some have even suggested that Arnim Zola, the Nazi scientist turned supercomputer AI from Winter Soldier is the real Clairvoyant.  For our purposes here, the distinction is irrelevant.

Even more important than the mere plot development, I believe, is that the destruction (or at least extreme diminishing) of SHIELD helps to solve a problem that has lingered in the Marvel universe since The Avengers and which has had an extremely negative impact on Agents of SHIELD: SHIELD is far too present and powerful to ignore in a standalone series or film.  Introducing SHIELD in The Avengers made a lot of sense.  It was an enormous “get-the-gang-together” spectacle that required all hands on deck in fighting an extraterrestrial invasion.  The film needed to be huge (it was after all the culmination of four years worth of films) and SHIELD needed to be big enough to effectively serve as the coordinator of a worldwide defensive mission while also giving orders to a disparate group of superheroes.

So we got Big SHIELD.  We got the helicarrier, the army, and the massive facility in the Potomac.  Unfortunately, with SHIELD came the expectation that they would always be there to fight the next threat.  So how do you tell an Iron Man story or a Thor story or an Agents of SHIELD story without bringing in Big SHIELD and all the characters and big budget accoutrements with them?  Iron Man 3 and Thor: The Dark World both succeeded by avoiding the question.  In Iron Man 3, Tony Stark spends much of the movie stranded in rural Tennessee without any means of communication and wanting to intentionally stay below the radar before he heads out on a madcap rescue effort that all happens fast enough and changes locations often enough that it’s reasonable to believe that SHIELD simply wasn’t fast enough to keep up with Stark or the villain.

Thor: The Dark World, likewise, took its title character outside of SHIELD’s purview and set the vast majority of the film in Asgard and other extraterrestrial worlds.  Only in the film’s closing fight does the action return to Earth, this time London, where the battle is pretty much over before we would ever hope to see Nick Fury and company. 

While Captain America: The Winter Soldier had the luxury of steering into the SHIELD skid by giving Fury and Black Widow featured roles, Agents of SHIELD has had the toughest job of the entire Marvel Universe.  How do you tell a story about SHIELD agents without giving the audience any of the big-name characters or big-budget action?  Unfortunately, prior to last week, the show hadn’t quite figured that out. 

As I saw it, SHIELD had two main problems.  The first is that the characters were all dull.  The writers tried so hard to keep every character enigmatic that nobody but Fitz and Simmons were really allowed to develop interesting personalities.  In retrospect, this was probably an intentional decision by Jed Whedon and Marissa Tancharoen (SHIELD’s showrunners) to lead us exactly where we ended up in last night’s episode “Turn, Turn, Turn.”  The hour was a tense thriller built on the belief that nobody could be trusted and that anybody could turn out to be a villain at any time.  Every time a new character entered a room, he was immediately the target of suspicion.  That we knew so little about Coulson’s team helped to boost the tension for the audience.  Because we know so little about Melinda May’s past, she is a plausible double-agent.  Because we don’t know everything that happened to Coulson in Tahiti, it’s plausible that he could be a double-agent or a Manchurian-style sleeper.  The same can be said about Skye, Trip, Hand, and, obviously, Garrett and Ward. 

That this episode – and this betrayal – has been coming since before the series even started doesn’t excuse the lack of character development even if it does explain it.  I can’t say for certain that this was the plan all along.  Maybe Brett Dalton is just a wooden actor.  Maybe the writers just couldn’t figure out how to make compelling characters without shrouding their personalities in mystery.  But now that we’ve moved past the Big Thing that’s been in the works for the show's entire run, I hope this will free Tancharoen and Whedon to develop their characters more deeply.

The second problem that SHIELD had was that Coulson was clearly the leader of a B-team.  While that was the intent of the series – to show the behind the scenes work of SHIELD when they’re not saving the world – it served mostly to sap all of the stakes out of the show.  There was never any sense of real danger because if anything ever got too harried, we knew that the A-team would show up to save the day.  It’s no coincidence that the best episode of the season was the one that most effectively created stakes, “F.Z.Z.T.,” in which Simmons’s life seems to be in genuine danger and the group is completely isolated from any potential backup.  Without the real possibility of abject failure, SHIELD has been bereft of drama and tension.  Instead, every episode has revolved around finding the Tchotchke of the Week and mostly trying not to screw things up too badly. 

With Captain America laying waste to the SHIELD organization that safety net is gone now.  Even more enticingly, “Turn, Turn, Turn” leaves open the prospect of a weakened but open and operational Hydra force, who is desperate to destroy the last remnants of SHIELD.  We know that Hydra still has control of a handful of international bases and the turncoat agents Garrett and Ward will certainly be focused on finding Coulson and company in particular.  For the first time in the young history of Agents of SHIELD there is a sense of urgency.  The good guys will be on the run without any support while their conflict with the villains has an emotional foundation.

There’s no guarantee that the writers will be able to turn it around.  Even if the secrecy surrounding pretty much all of SHIELD’s characters was meant to preserve this twist, that’s no excuse for them of them simply being so boring.  And just because the rise of Hydra and the destruction of SHIELD could raise the stakes for the series, doesn’t mean they will.  A lot still depends on the ability of Whedon and Tancharoen to turn things around, but for the first time since the pilot, I’m actually excited about the prospects for where Agents of SHIELD might go in the future.

Tyler Williams is a professional librarian and amateur television critic.  You can find him at tytalkstv AT gmail DOT com or on Twitter @TyTalksTV.

No comments:

Post a Comment