The trio of teams I once enjoyed, but now despise. |
I don’t normally write about The Amazing Race, even though I enjoy the show a great deal,
because I typically find that I have very little to say about the show beyond
just recapping the events of any particular episode. But this season has been particularly
troubling to me because it’s been emphasizing some of my least favorite aspects
of the show, both in terms of the racers and the format of the race itself. So I figured I’d use this season (and the
last few episodes in particular) to explore my Grand Unified Theory of The
Amazing Race and use it to explain why I’m only really rooting for one team
anymore this season. So without further
ado, I present to you:
Tyler’s Grand Unified
Theory of The Amazing Race
Principle One: It’s a Game
When I say “It’s a game,” I mean that any actions within the
rules are acceptable. There should be no
whining or complaining about somebody playing the game using the rules and
tools provided. This principle was most
blatantly violated last week by Dan Dave & Connor who bitched endlessly about
the fact that Brendon & Rachel U-Turned them. I get that the U-Turn is a divisive gameplay
element and has been since its predecessor, The Yield, was introduced ten years
ago in Season Five (it’s hard to believe it’s really been that long). There are multiple strategic uses (or
non-uses) for the U-Turn. Some teams
will use it to stay out of last place.
Some will use it to ensure victory in a leg (as Brendon & Rachel
did). Some would even argue that you
shouldn’t use the U-Turn unless absolutely necessary because it could end up
backfiring on you. And those people
might end up being right, given that the previews for next week’s episode show
that the Double U-Turn will be popping up again.
No matter what your strategic views on the U-Turn, you
cannot complain about its actual use as “unfair” or “not right,” as Dan Dave &
Connor and their “accidental alliance” did.
You especially can’t play the age card and whine about U-Turning “a
60-year old man” when that 60-year old man is half of a team that has won three
legs, has yet to finish lower than fourth place in any given leg, and has
pretty well established itself as one of the two best teams left in the
race. The proper response to being
U-Turned by an opponent is not to complain about its “fairness” but to race faster
so that you’re not behind them at the end of a Detour.
Principle Two: No Moralizing
One of the ugliest moments of this week’s episode came in
passing and likely went unnoticed by most of the audience. It involved Caroline & Jennifer calling
Brendon & Rachel “NLUs,” short for “Not Like Us.” As Dan Fienberg at Hitfix pointed out in his recap,
it’s a textbook “page out of Bullying 101.”*
You identify a target who is “not like you,” choose an action or behavior
you find particularly appalling, ostracize the target, and then recruit others
to join you in ostracizing the target.
Now, I can’t say that Caroline & Jennifer are consciously engaging
in bullying behavior, but the fact that they use the phrase “not like us” often
enough to need an acronym for it says a great deal more than they’re probably
willing to admit.
* Specific examples of
“indirect bullying” that we’ve seen from the “Accidental Alliance” this season
according to Peter Ross, Phillip Slee, and Ken Rigby:
Refusing to socialize with the victim, bullying other children so they
don’t socialize with the target, ostracizing the victim, criticizing their
appearance, dress, etc., name-calling, silent treatment, laughing and joking at
the expense of the victim.
This year’s teams are providing an extreme example of
what it looks like to violate Principle Two.
The simple fact is that, provided everybody stays within the rules
and is actively trying to win, there is no “right way” or “wrong way” to run The Amazing Race. And yet it continues to happen every season
that some team gets offended because they were U-Turned or another team took
their cab and they try to paint the perpetrators as the morally bankrupt
villains. But there is no right or wrong
in the race, only winning and losing and so long as you’re following the rules
and trying to be a winner, you’re racing the “right way.”
Now that’s not to say that there aren’t strategic advantages
to be gained from bringing moralism into the race. Leo & Jamal seem to be trying that very
ploy, teaming up with the aforementioned aggrieved teams not because they have
any particular animosity toward Brendon & Rachel or sympathy for the
“Accidental Alliance,” but because they see Dan Dave & Connor and Caroline &
Jennifer as the two weakest remaining teams and think they would be at an
advantage racing against them in the final leg as opposed to Brendon &
Rachel or Jet & Cord. That’s a
perfectly valid strategy, but then Leo & Jamal haven’t really been
complaining about any teams playing “the wrong way,” they’ve just taken
advantage of the atmosphere.
Principal Three: It’s a Race!
Where Leo & Jamal have lost me is in their seemingly
slavish devotion to their alliance. We’ve
seen alliances before. We’ve even seen
lopsided alliances before. Hell, Caroline
& Jennifer helped boost themselves to a fourth-place finish two seasons ago
by partnering with eventual winners Bates & Anthony. But that alliance, as all Amazing Race alliances should be, was
both transitory and mutually beneficial.
Bates & Anthony helped them a lot but they pulled their own weight a
lot as well.
This season, however, the Country Blondes have been just
this side of useless since almost the beginning. In the last leg they failed to solve a
relatively simple puzzle and needed Leo & Jamal to give them the
answer. Prior to that they failed to
assemble a toy donkey and needed Dan Dave & Connor to both show them how to put
it together and carry it for them. Before
that, they had to team up with Dan Dave & Connor on a pair of Roadblocks, had to
beg the Express Pass out of Jet & Cord, and still managed
to finish last in two legs only to be saved by a Non-Elimination.
Yet there were Leo & Jamal giving Caroline &
Jennifer another answer despite the pair being tied for the last. For the record, that was the second time this
season that Leo & Jamal have flat out given
an opponent the answer to a task when that opponent was the only team left
behind them. Luckily, they’ve managed to
avoid elimination both times but in their attempts to avoid offending teams,
they’ve forgotten the most important third principle of The Amazing Race: “It’s a race!”
The team that finishes last loses.
So if you’re going to form an alliance or help another team, make sure
that you’re getting something back from the exchange. Don’t just give away the answer to a
puzzle. Make sure that you’re helping
teams who can help you back.
That’s my Grand Unified Theory of The Amazing Race. It’s not
complicated. It’s just meant to remind
us all why we’re here: to reach the finish line first. It also has made this season particularly
frustrating. If you had told me in the
premiere that these would be the final five teams I would have been
excited. I never particularly enjoyed
Brendon & Rachel their first time around, but I didn’t have any animosity
toward them, which seems to be the general response from viewers who knew them
from their previous appearances on Big
Brother. That team aside, though, I
actually did like the other four teams who are still alive. But the three teams I’ve highlighted here
have all managed to completely lose any sympathy I had for them coming into the season.
With three legs left (airing over the next two weeks), I
have only one team to root for: cowboys Jet & Cord, who just might be the
best team in Amazing Race history at
completing tasks but who have an infuriatingly consistent knack for getting
lost. I could probably be satisfied with
a Brendon & Rachel win but I fear it’s going to come down to whiners,
bullies, and morons and this season is going to end in extremely disappointing
fashion.
Tyler Williams is a
professional librarian and amateur television critic. You can reach him at tytalkstv AT gmail DOT
com or on Twitter @TyTalksTV.
I was really rooting for Dave (not Dan) and Connor at the beginning of the season and am one of those Big Brother fans who holds much animosity toward "Brenchel." But I'm with you on this one. Dave and Connor's whining killed me and the fact that it was targeted at Brendan and Rachel has kept me conflicted. Argh.
ReplyDeleteI've discovered that I don't like Brendon & Rachel when they're losing but I can kind of like them when they're winning. When she struggles, Rachel has a tendency to melt down (she's similar to Luke in that way). But when she and Brendon are doing well, she's happy and excited and generally what I want from racers. The only thing that keeps me reserved is the whole "if we win Brendon will let me have a baby" thing, which kind of creeps me out. But she's a professional reality contestant at this point so I can see her just making that up to give them a storyline for the season.
ReplyDeleteAnd thanks for the "Dave" catch. I was meticulous about making sure I spelled Brendon's name right but didn't even think twice about that one.