Kit Harington gets his hero's moment in "Game of Thrones" |
“Well that was fun,” were the first words out of my mouth
following Sunday’s epic, episode-long battle in Game of Thrones’s “The Watchers on the Wall.” And it was, indeed, great fun. It had an extended fight scene with giants and
mammoths, exploding barrels, and a minute-long tracking crane shot that final
gave us the full scope of Castle Black.
And, yet, at the end, I couldn’t help but feel that the entire piece was
a bit hollow - empty calories at the end of what has thus far been a season-long
feast of character work. Around this
time last year I was pitching Game of
Thrones to win the Emmy for Outstanding Drama and I still think it merits
consideration. But at this point in its
lifetime, I think Thrones has moved
beyond mere spectacle and has become a legitimately great drama. Unfortunately, the hollowness felt at the end
of last Sunday’s episode belies the fact that some characters on this show are
much better developed than others and that the people at the wall are not yet
capable of carrying their own hour.
Let’s start with the obvious comparison to season two’s Blackwater, which “The Watchers on the
Wall” was clearly meant to evoke. First
off, both episodes were the ninth of their respective seasons, when the writers
like to pull out their big guns (see also: the beheading of [SPOILER] in season
one and The Red Wedding last year). Secondly,
they are the only two episodes in the run of the series to be set entirely in
one location. Lastly, both episodes
depict immense battle sequences with potentially game-changing
consequences.
“The Watchers on the Wall” certainly succeeded at the
spectacle aspect. Visually, this was a
stunning episode, perhaps the best that Game
of Thrones has ever produced.
Director Neil Marshall was reportedly given an eight-figure budget to
work with and it shows, from the flaming mammoth to the gorgeous crane shot to
the wall itself. The close-up fighting,
too, was some of the best I’ve seen. Much of the
choreography in “Blackwater” was muddied by the darkness of the setting. Here, however, the lighting and staging allow
the battle to unfold in all its glory.
Aesthetics aside, however, “The Watchers on the Wall”
ultimately could not stand up to “Blackwater” for the very simple reason that I
didn’t really care about most of the characters. “Blackwater” truly felt like the culmination
of a season’s worth of storytelling.
Stannis makes his move for the throne.
Tyrion, basically the default lead character of the season, takes
command of the city’s army and becomes a true leader. Joffrey is exposed as the sniveling wimp
we’ve always known him to be. Cersei
begins her descent into paranoia, threatening Sansa and nearly poisoning
Tommen. And Tywin and Loras arrive to
save the day, the former protecting his grandson and the latter avenging his
lover’s death. Even lesser characters
like Bronn and The Hound get great moments and the battle ends definitively,
with Stannis sent fleeing back to Dragonstone where he’s basically been ever since.
“The Watchers on the Wall,” rather than being the conclusion to a larger story, seems more like the midpoint of the tale and a not particularly interesting one at that. It is the ascent of Jon Snow, which would be fine enough except that Jon is a rather dull character who has spent most of the last two seasons away from the wall and Castle Black. The result is that, Sam and Gilly aside, I had no real idea who any of these people were. I probably could have identified Ser Alliser and Maester Aemon, but only as the leader who keeps shooting down Jon’s ideas and the old, blind guy who saved his skin, respectively. Otherwise, they were mostly fodder, ready to be chewed up and spit out. Even Ygritte’s death felt largely empty because she hadn’t been a real force in Jon's life since late last season. Unless you became invested enough in that relationship to carry through the entire season (ten full episodes) since Ygritte shot Jon full of arrows, I don’t see how that scene, as well done as it was, could have nearly the emotional impact it was clearly expected to.
Let me be clear, this was a massively entertaining episode
of television. But Game of Thrones has been so good for the past couple of years that
I expect more than just “entertaining.”
Unfortunately, I don’t think that the characters at the wall have been
developed well enough to support an entire episode whose drama relies almost
entirely on whether these little-known faces will live or die. This was a good episode, but Thrones is capable of much, much better.
A couple of spare thoughts –
It was nice to see Sam finally find use as a facilitator of
action. He might not be the best
fighter, but he’s really good at making other fighters better.
I do really like where “The Watchers on the Wall” leaves
Jon. He comes out as the definitive
hero, having almost single-handedly won the assault at the top of the wall and
the battle at Castle Black. But he’s
smart enough to realize that this is just the beginning and that, even his plan
to deal with Mance is stupid, it’s the only plan they’ve got.
Apparently the man Jon orders to hold the gate from the
giant was named “Grenn.” Even though I
didn’t know that, his brief speech and the rallying of his fellow soldiers with
the Night’s Watch oath were sufficiently spine-tingly.
Tyler Williams is a
professional librarian and an amateur television critic. You can reach him at tytalkstv AT gmail DOT
com or on Twitter @TyTalksTV.
No comments:
Post a Comment