Will fires Mac (sort of) on "The Newsroom" |
It’s impossible to talk about “Election Night, pt. 1” as
anything other than the first half of a two-part finale. Because of that, I’m finding it difficult to
find anything interesting to say. There’s
no attempt whatsoever to bring any kind of closure to any of the storylines
introduced here and, by the end, the whole episode comes off as just ramping up
to what should be a much more thrilling conclusion.
I don’t mean to say that this episode wasn’t bad. It was fun (and funny), but there was very
little depth to it. And every single
storyline was either an extension from the last episode or setup for next. I appreciate what Leona is doing in keeping
everybody on board and, while I think it’s the wrong decision, I understand why
she’s making it and it seems in character.
That she would funnel all of her anger at Jerry and refuse to give in to
even the sanest of decisions out of spite makes sense. It’s also nice getting the other side of
things from Reese, who would scrap the whole lot, if he wasn’t so terrified of
his mother.
But all of that is still in “to be continued” mode at
episode’s end. Even Will’s promise to
fire Mac after Election night doesn’t feel like it’s going to take. It’d be really nice for the Genoa storyline,
which was such a colossal screwup, to have consequences beyond this
season. But it really feels like we’re
going to largely get a reset by next year’s premiere.
Structural problems aside, this was an enjoyable hour of
television. I always enjoy The Newsroom the most when it’s
producing the news and here we get some great stuff. The bickering between Eliot and Sloan over
who "called" a story (and Sloan’s subsequent botching of the story) was great,
though Sloan’s on-air ineptitude combined with her book signing incident and
Mac’s freak out at having Oxford on her Wikipedia page instead of Cambridge
make this not such a great episode for the women. The mocking of “the bullpen” and Eliot’s
pained attempts to extract usable footage from a stats nerd was fantastic
lampooning of the over-the-top efforts of the actual news networks. All they needed was a holographic Will McAvoy
and a giant touchscreen television and it would have been perfect.
The one story that consistently frustrated me and largely
drew me out of the drama was the setup for the General Petraeus story. You see, there is no Californian Congressman
named Brody. Nor was there a
congressional candidate from California named Brody. I understand that part of the story involved
this fake person making incredibly insensitive statements twenty years ago and
you don’t want to attribute fake statements to a real person. And apparently Sorkin couldn’t find real,
inflammatory statements from a real person to use for this story, but The Newsroom is a show that tenuously
straddles the line between real and fiction.
Up to this point, everything we’ve been shown has been portrayed as
happening in our world. Even the Genoa
story, though it turned out to be fake, is portrayed as something that could
really happen. Introducing a fake person
(meant to be taken as real), muddies that line even more and, frankly, took me
out of the narrative of the show for a good half hour because I was desperately
trying to figure out who this person was they were talking about. If The Newsroom
wants to be fiction, that’s fine. If it
wants to be set in the real world, that’s fine to. But it can’t just start making up
Congressmen. In that direction there be
dragons.
A few spare thoughts –
I’m glad they found a way to bring back Constance Zimmer
even if she is a bit over-the-top in her Romney rooting. It’s a good character and she’s a good
actress and I’ll be interested to see what sort of ammunition Sorkin gives her
that she can use to “take apart” Will in the finale.
I’m also curious how the Michigan 1st story is
going to pan out. The numbers woman
thinks Benishek will win 51-49 but it’s actually going to come down to less than
2,000 votes at 48.1%-47.6%.
Funny, funny episode tonight with lots of great lines
“True story. Which is more than we can say about the
story.”
“People have been fired for
making mistakes less small than this.”
“People have been incarcerated for making mistakes less small than
this.”
“You’re screaming names of smart people in my ear. They teach you that at Oxford?”
No comments:
Post a Comment